|
Contents
Resistant Cotton Stymies Pests
As boll weevil eradication progresses across the U.S. Cotton Belt, cotton
growers are tapping a potent arsenal of anti-weevil weaponry.
In the cotton field, growers can set bait tubes that use a pheromone to lure
weevils to their doom. They may also soon enlist tiny, parasitic wasps that
hunt the weevils' larvae. And on the high-tech front, computer maps are
tracking the weevils' every move so growers can better time insecticidal sprays
or other control tactics.
Now Agricultural Research Service scientists are mustering the cotton
plant's own natural defenses in combating boll weevils.
At Mississippi State, Mississippi, ARS agronomist Jack C. McCarty, Jr., and
colleagues have built a stock of cotton germplasm armed with built-in bolt
weevil defense: flower buds that deter female weevils from laying eggs. McCarty
labels such germplasm as "resistant" and says one factor may be that
their buds produce low quantities of natural sugars.
For in early summer, a female weevil seeks out cotton buds. She lands, then
tastes the buds to gauge whether they're rich enough in the sugars, proteins,
and other nutrients her larvae will need for growth. She'll lay her eggs inside
the buds if they meet her tastes, so to speak.
"The eggs are actually placed among or in the anthers. There, an
abundance of nutrientsparticularly sugarsprovides an excellent food
source," McCarty says. "That also protects the eggs from
predators."
But the resistant cotton deters such egg-layingso much so "you
get a reduction of about 50 percent," says McCarty, who is in ARS' Cotton
Host Plant Resistance Research Unit at Mississippi State. "That's some of
the best resistance we've gotten up to this time."
Otherwise, buds with weevil eggs inside them fall to the ground, or abscise.
Detached from the plant, the buds can't produce lint, the fluffy white fiber
that growers harvest.
"Most of the feeding damage to the cotton plant is caused by the male
weevil, which tunnels into the bud," McCarty says.
"But growers are more concerned about abscission of the bud."

Boll weevil on a cotton bud.
(K6009-2)
|
He worked with chemist Paul A. Hedin and Johnie N. Jenkins, director of ARS'
Crop Science Research Laboratory at Mississippi State, to breed the dozen or so
germplasm lines. They accomplished this by first evaluating wild cotton strains
acquired from Mexico and Central America, cotton's place of origin. There, over
thousands of years of evolution, these strains apparently survived the weevil
by using built-in genetic resistance.
From their evaluations, the researchers selected 69 weevil-resistant
strains. They crossed these with commercial cotton cultivars, selecting
germplasm lines whose flowering would allow for further testing.
During trial plantings at Mississippi State from 1987 to 1993, "the
resistant germplasm lines generally received half as many egg deposits as
commercial varieties used as checks," McCarty says.
Cooperating researchers at Texas A&M University at College Station and
Louisiana State University's Experiment Station at Baton Rouge reported similar
findings in test plantings there.
Maurice J. Lukefahr of Rio Farms also grew the resistant cotton on 1-acre
plots in Ed Couch, Texas. Lukefahr, a retired ARS entomologist who worked with
the Mississippi researchers in earlier studies, says he sprayed insecticide
three or four fewer times on the test plots than on his commercial acreage.
"Typically," notes McCarty of such field tests, "it takes 3
to 4 weeks longer for boll weevils to reach damaging population levels. So you
would delay spraying insecticide until that time."
For cotton growers, that delay can mean significant savings in insecticide
costs. It can also mean less residual insecticide in the environmenta
main objective of scientists in breeding pest-resistant crops.
However, "The resistant germplasm lines aren't at a commercial state,
as far as their yield and other agronomic properties are concerned,"
McCarty says. That's because it's taken more than a decade's worth of
backcrossing and field-testing to confirm that the resistance trait remains
stable, passing from one plant generation to the next.
It's also taken extensive laboratory testing and chemical analysis for the
researchers to "finger" the trait's influence on weevil egg-laying.
"We looked at terpenoids, allelochemicals, surface waxes, and a number
of other compounds," Hedin says. "The only thing we were sure had an
identifiable effect on egg-laying in laboratory tests was the low sugar. But
that's probably not the entire answer as to why we get lower egg numbers."
Now, eradication may quell the need for breeding the germplasm as
higher-yielding commercial varieties, Hedin says. In eradication, cotton
growers, industry representatives, and state agricultural officials coordinate
pesticide use and other tactics to boot weevils from the state, region by
region.
In Mississippi, Tennessee, and other cotton-growing states, researchers and
grower associations foresee weevil eradication in 8 to 10 years.
"Boll weevil eradication is at least in our sights now," says Andy
Jordan, Technical Service director for the National Cotton Council of America
in Memphis, Tennessee. "But I think we'd be remiss not to develop
alternative weevil control technologies."
Jordan envisions that as a commercial crop, weevil-resistant cotton might
benefit growers who don't use insecticides because their fields are near
residences, wildlife preserves, or other sensitive areas.
Also, the boll weevil has withstood efforts to vanquish it for over 100
years, reigning as cotton's "pest supreme" since it arrived in
Brownsville, Texas, from Mexico in the early 1890's. With that in mind,
resistant cotton could offer a comforting safeguard or buffer in states
bordering areas that still have the pest.
By Jan Suszkiw, ARS.
Jack
C. McCarty and
Johnie
N. Jenkins are at the USDA-ARS
Crop
Science Research Laboratory, 810 Highway 12 East, Mississippi State, MS,
39762; phone (662) 320-7386, fax (662) 320-7528.
"Resistant Cotton Stymies Pests" was published
in the November 1995
issue of Agricultural Research magazine.
[Top]
|