|
Contents
Haptoglobin Test for Cattle Health

A rapid onsite immunoassay test kit to measure blood levels of
haptoglobina sure sign of infection in cattlehas been developed by
ARS biologists Larry Stanker (left) and Colin Young. They hope that a
commercial kit will soon be available to veterinarians and producers.
(K7271-1)
|
A new, quick, and inexpensive test for a telltale protein could help tip off
producers and veterinarians that a seemingly healthy cow has an internal
infection, or that cattle on antibiotic treatments are indeed on the mend.
The protein, called haptoglobin, is undetectable in the blood of healthy
cattle. But when a cow has an infection or inflammation that causes tissue
damage, the animal's liver produces haptoglobin in abundance. High haptoglobin
levels have been reported in the blood of cattle with mastitis, metritis,
pyometra, traumatic reticulitis, abomasal displacement, traumatic pericarditis,
bacterial nephritis, and hepatic lipidosis.
An early warning of rising haptoglobin levels could be useful to both the
cattle producer and the veterinarian in managing herd health. But traditional
diagnostic tests to measure haptoglobin levels were complex, labor-intensive
laboratory procedures that took up to 2 days to complete.
ARS researchers Larry H. Stanker and Colin R. Young have "built a
better mousetrap"in this case, a test that pinpoints haptoglobin
levels in hours rather than days. It uses test materials that are inexpensive,
nonhazardous, and readily available and could be used "anywhere you can
set up a card table," says Stanker. Stanker and Young are biologists at
the ARS Food Animal Protection Research Laboratory at College Station, Texas.
The key to the Texas researchers' test is a monoclonal antibody they
developed called Hap 1. If any haptoglobinsuch as in a blood sample from
a cowcomes in contact with the Hap 1 antibody, it will bind tightly to
the antibody.
"To perform our test, you mix the blood sample with the Hap 1
antibody," explains Stanker.
"Then you put that mixture on a test plate that already has haptoglobin
on the surface.
"If there's no haptoglobin in the cow's blood, the Hap 1 antibody will
instead cling to the haptoglobin on the test plate. But if the cow's blood
contains haptoglobin, it will have already bound up the Hap 1 antibody, so
there's not much Hap 1 free to bind to the haptoglobin on the test plate."
Stanker and Young have patented both the Hap 1 antibody and the diagnostic
test. Now they're seeking a commercial partner to license the antibody and to
test and develop a marketable version for field and lab use.
The ARS scientists' diagnostic testcalled competitive inhibition
assayhas proven very accurate, compared with results from the traditional
haptoglobin measurement technique, says Stanker.
In one set of field tests, the ARS researchers checked haptoglobin levels in
84 veal calves. The competitive inhibition assay detected haptoglobin in all
those calves that later were found to have inflammatory lesions.
In another study with 60 feedlot calves with respiratory disease, animals
that received antibiotic treatment had lower haptoglobin levels at the final
examination, compared with calves that did not receive antibiotics. This
supports the idea that haptoglobin levels could be used to gauge an animal's
response to therapy and the effectiveness of antibiotic treatments.
"If an animal's haptoglobin levels are quite high, that probably means
the animal has an immune response to something going on," says Stanker.
"But on the other hand, you wouldn't just check haptoglobin levels alone
and, if they're normal, assume that everything is fine with those animals.
"Our hope is that haptoglobin levels could be checked as part of a
series of diagnostic tests that also take a look at the animal's temperature
and other factors. This would be simply another diagnostic tool in veterinary
medicine." By Sandy Miller Hays, ARS.
USDA-ARS
Food
Animal Protection Research Laboratory, 2381 F&B Road, College Station,
TX 77845; phone (409) 260- 9306
"Haptoglobin Test for Cattle Health" was published in the
May 1996
issue of Agricultural Research magazine.
[Top]
|