|
Contents
Managing Poultry Manure Nutrients

To gather information about the interaction
between surface runoff and groundwater,
ARS soil scientist Thomas Sauer (right) and
Van Brahana, a hydrogeologist with the
U.S. Geological Survey's Water Resources
Division, use a conductivity meter to assess
the flow dynamics of a natural spring.
(K8055-19)
|
Arkansas is nicknamed the "Land of Opportunity," and
Agricultural Research Service scientists
there are taking every opportunity to preserve the state's natural beauty by
helping to reduce the impact of runoff from poultry litter.
Scientists in the ARS Poultry Production and Product Safety Research Unit at
Fayetteville are focusing on soil properties and slope, the seasonal dynamics
of surface runoff, and the effects of adding aluminum sulfate to poultry litter
to optimize manure application.
"We're searching for ways to reduce nutrient runoff from poultry litter
into lakes and streams," says soil chemist Philip A. Moore, Jr. "The
first step is determining where runoff does and does not occur, so we can find
better ways to manage it."
More than 7.5 billion broiler chickens raised in the United States each year
produce up to 7 million tons of poultry litter. The litter is a mixture of
chicken manure, feathers, spilled food, and bedding material. Many farmers use
it as an inexpensive fertilizer for cropland because the manure contains
nitrogen and phosphorus, two important fertilizer ingredients. But water that
runs off fields fertilized with poultry litter may carry excess nutrients to
nearby waterways, hurting water quality and aquatic life.
Soil scientist Thomas J. Sauer is looking at ways to manage litter to
minimize this runoff.
"Many things can influence nutrient runoff after animal manure is
applied, including weather, physical and chemical properties of the soil, and
land use," he says.
In a recent field study, Sauer found that trends in the measured soil's
chemical and physical properties were related to its slope and plant cover--for
example, pasture versus forest. If farmers take these things into
consideration, they can reduce nutrient runoff. For example, silty alluvial
soils found near rivers are potentially important in capturing runoff from
upland pastures before it reaches the river.
More To Be Learned
Sauer says additional research is needed to verify the role that areas along
streams and rivers play in retaining nutrients delivered from uphill pastures.
And, he says, farmers developing best-management practices for poultry litter
application should pay close attention to areas with low water infiltration
rates and to upland pasture soils' ability to retain applied nutrients.
At a site in Arkansas, Sauer and Moore studied two small watersheds within a
tall fescue pasture. They installed automated equipment to measure the rate and
composition of runoff. They also installed sensors to measure precipitation and
soil moisture and to continuously record evaporation.
"Some important trends are already apparent," reports Sauer.
"Throughout the summer of 1997, evaporation dominated the water
balance. The tall fescue grass showed strong drought tolerance and withdrew
water from deep down, after the surface layers became very dry," he says.
"By summer's end, it took several significant rainfalls to replenish soil
moisture in the root zone before groundwater movement began."
The researchers applied poultry litter to the watersheds in May 1997.
Because of below-normal rainfall, no runoff occurred until January 1998.

Soil scientist Philip Moore looks for signs
of dermatitis on a chicken raised in a poultry
house with alum-treated litter. Alum has been shown to reduce dermatitis in
chickens.
(K8032-1)
|
"We hope to relate the occurrence, timing, and volume of surface runoff
to storm characteristics, height of the grass, and surface soil moisture
content," says Sauer.
"Preliminary figures from our site in Arkansas suggest that information
on soil properties and slope could be used to develop and improve strategies
for applying animal waste to land. This type of approach could supplement
existing methods for assessing nutrient runoff.
"Poultry litter," Sauer says, "can be a valuable nutrient and
organic matter resource that can help sustain and revitalize a grower's soil,
if soil and landscape position information are used in designing land
application programs."
Farmers may be able to reduce runoff simply by planting the right grass.
Moore is interested in seeing if different grasses affect runoff. LeAnn Davis,
a graduate student at the University of Arkansas who works with Moore, found
there was less water and phosphorus runoff with tall fescue grass compared to
eastern gamagrass, switchgrass, bermudagrass, or bluestem grass.
They're not sure at this point in the study why there are differences in
effectiveness among the grasses.
Alum Cleanses Runoff
Treating poultry litter with aluminum sulfate (alum) also helps reduce
nutrient runoff. Moore developed and patented a method for adding alum to
poultry litter. He found that it reduced phosphorus runoff. [See "A
Cleanup for Poultry Litter," Agricultural Research, May 1994, pp.
10-11.]
Since his original findings, Moore has discovered even more benefits from
using alum.
In recent field studies, he added alum to poultry litter in chicken houses
at two farms in Arkansas--the largest chicken-producing state. It was applied
to used litter after one group of chickens had been removed and before the next
group was started. Later, he fertilized fields with the treated litter to see
how it would affect phosphorus runoff.
"Not only did the alum reduce phosphorus runoff by 70 percent, it cut
runoff of heavy metals such as copper, iron, and zinc by 40 to 50
percent," Moore says.
Alum has added safety and production benefits: It reduces ammonia released
from chicken manure into poultryhouse air. Moore says decreasing ammonia
improves breathing conditions for the birds.
"It also reduces poultryhouse workers' health risks from inhaling
ammonia," he adds. "Chronic exposure to high ammonia levels can cause
respiratory problems."
Broilers grown in alum-treated poultryhouses weighed more on average than
those in nontreated houses--3.8 pounds versus 3.65 pounds.
Another economically important advantage that Moore found was improved feed
conversion in birds raised in alum-treated houses. Growers who participated in
a recent study found less feed was needed to produce a pound of chicken in
alum-treated houses.
The patented alum treatment is licensed to General Chemical in Parsippany,
New Jersey, under the product name Al+Clear. Poultry growers in 15 states and
Canada are using alum.
"Widespread use of this technology should reduce the negative impact of
runoff from poultry waste on water quality," says Moore.--By
Tara Weaver, Agricultural
Research Service Information Staff.
Philip A. Moore, Jr., , and
Thomas J. Sauer are in the
USDA-ARS Poultry Production and Product
Safety Research Unit, University of Arkansas, 0-303 Poultry Science Center,
Fayetteville, AR 72704; phone (501) 575-2654, fax (501) 575-7465.
"Managing Poultry Manure Nutrients" was published in the
June 1998 issue of Agricultural Research magazine. Click
here to see this issue's table of
contents.
[Top]
|