|
Contents
What To Expect From Mothers in the
Military

Research instructor Roman Shypailo uses dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry to
measure the body fat and bone mineral density of U.S. Army major Maureen
Barthen, before pregnancy.
(K8038-1)
|
If a female soldier decides to have a child, how quickly will she be ready
to return to duty?
Women in the military are expected to maintain a trim appearance. And the
military requires all members to pass periodic weight, body fat, and fitness
tests. Current military regulations give women 6 months after delivery to meet
those requirements. Is that a reasonable expectation?
The U.S. Department of Defense is financing a study at the Children's
Nutrition Research Center in Houston, Texas, to learn exactly what women can
expect from their bodies before, during, and after pregnancy. It will also
address when the military can expect women to return to duty readiness. The
research facility is run jointly by Baylor College of Medicine and USDA's
Agricultural Research Service.
"This research project, one of the most comprehensive of its kind, will
follow 68 military and civilian women's pregnancies," says nutritionist
Nancy F. Butte, who leads the study. "Researchers will use the latest
scientific tools to assess their calorie needs, body composition, and physical
ability."
"Very few studies examine what's happening during pregnancy with this
level of complexity, and most do not include pre-pregnancy data," says
lactation physiologist Judy M. Hopkinson. "By including before-and-after
data, we will be able to see changes that other studies beginning at 8 to 10
weeks of gestation may have missed."
The researchers will be using four component models to estimate body
composition. These models combine several different measurements to calculate
body fat. Simpler models of body composition use fewer measurements and require
more assumptions about the body. But some of those assumptions may not be valid
during pregnancy. By combining techniques to measure components of the body,
assumptions can be avoided, resulting in greater accuracy.
For example, fat mass and body density can be calculated by
hydrodensitometry--that is, by weighing a woman in and out of a tank of water.
This technique assumes a certain portion of lean tissue is water--a problem,
since the water content of lean tissue increases during pregnancy.
Researchers compensate by adding another test. They give the women water
tagged with a safe, nonradioactive form of hydrogen. This allows researchers to
measure the total amount of water in the body. By combining data on body
density and total body water, they obtain a more accurate estimate of body fat.
Measuring Total Calorie Use
The researchers also use doubly labeled water tagged with nonradioactive
forms of both hydrogen and oxygen to make precise measurements of caloric
expenditure. The volunteers drink the labeled water, and for 14 days, they
provide saliva samples. The rate at which hydrogen and oxygen disappear from
the body as water or carbon dioxide gives investigators an estimate of how many
calories a woman uses. This works because burning food calories uses oxygen and
gives off carbon dioxide.
Each woman spends 24 hours in one of the research center's four
state-of-the-art whole-room calorimeters. These look like small hotel rooms
complete with television, bed, bathroom, and a treadmill. Such rooms are
designed to estimate energy expenditure from very precise measurements of
oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide. By comparing data from the doubly
labeled water and the calorimeter, scientists can estimate how much energy each
woman uses for physical activity.

U.S. Army lieutenant Regina McWilliams exercises on a treadmill.
(K8038-2)
|
Dietitian Caryn Honig completed the study on May 13, 1997, when her second
daughter, Natasha, was 6 months old. Honig, 32, works at the Texas Children's
Hospital, where she counsels young people with special dietary needs.
"In the first trimester, I burned more calories than in pre-pregnancy;
in the second, even more; and in the third, still more," says Honig.
"After Natasha was born, I went back to my pre-pregnancy levels--almost to
the calorie. For me, this reinforced how important it is to get enough to eat
during pregnancy."
The center researchers are also looking at how pregnancy affects body
protein, muscle strength, and bone mass. They use dual-energy x-ray
absorptiometry (DEXA) before pregnancy and 2 weeks and 6 months after delivery.
The instrument provides a three-component (bone, lean tissue, and fat) analysis
of the body using safe, ultralow levels of x-rays. To protect the fetus, it's
not used during pregnancy. What is learned may help settle some scientific
disputes.
"Some studies show bone is lost during pregnancy, but others suggest
that it doesn't change--or even increases," says Hopkinson. "We want
to look at the net effect of pregnancy on bone mineral content."
But what about protein, the main component of muscle tissue? Researchers
measure total body nitrogen, a key part of those proteins, before and just
after pregnancy and again 6 months later. Exercise physiologist Margarita
Treuth uses a series of strength and exercise tests to obtain a comprehensive
picture of the effect of pregnancy and how quickly women return to
pre-pregnancy status.
This information will be used to evaluate whether the military's standards
for body weight and the requirement for weight gain during pregnancy are
compatible.
Determining a Desirable BMI
The military body weight standard is based on a person's body mass index.
This is calculated by dividing body weight in kilograms by the square of a
person's height in meters. A woman at 5 feet 5 inches can weigh no more than
144 pounds, to meet the military standard of a BMI of 24.
"Pre-pregnancy BMI is a determinant of fetal growth," says Butte.
"The recommended weight gain in women with a low BMI (below 19.8) is
higher than for women with average or above-average BMIs. But we don't know
which part of that compensating gain is benefiting the fetus. Is it gains in
fat, free fat mass, or water? It may be there's a threshold for maternal fat
below which fetal growth is compromised. That's one reason we need a better
physiological model of pregnancy," she says.
The four-component model and the expertise of Butte's research team have
already identified an error in the equation the military uses to calculate fat
mass. Military equations, based on body circumference measurements,
underestimate fat mass. The margin of error in greater in heavier women.
How do the military women feel about this study?
Major Maureen Barthen, 36, a military reservist for 3 years, is at the
pre-conception stage. She works at the 75th Army Division in
Houston, Texas, evaluating her unit's wartime readiness. At home, she's the
mother of 6-year-old Frances and Amelia, a 4-year-old.
"I'm really excited about the study," says Barthen, "I want
to learn more about my body's changes in pregnancy. This is not just because
I'm in the reserves. Being fit is part of staying healthy."
This research will benefit not only military women like Barthen, but also
all women concerned about regaining fitness after their babies are born.--By
Jill Lee, Agricultural Research
Service Information Staff, 6303 Ivy Lane, Greenbelt, Maryland 20770, phone
(301) 344-2781.
Nancy F. Butte and
Judy M. Hopkinson are at the
Children's Nutrition Research
Center, Baylor College of Medicine, 1100 Bates St., Houston, TX 77030-2600;
phone
[Butte] (713) 798-7179, fax (713) 798-7187. [Hopkinson] (713) 798-7008, fax
(713) 798-7098.
"What To Expect From Mothers in the Military" was published
in the April 1998 issue of Agricultural Research magazine. Click here to see this
issue's table of contents.
[Top]
|