Honey Bee Breeding, Genetics, and Physiology Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Publications
Complete Reprint List
Recent Reprint list
Russian Queen Project Chronology
Small Hive Beetle Extension Pamphlet
 

Projects
headline bar
1 - Index Page (scroll down for more information)
2 - A USDA-ARS Project to Evaluate Resistance to
3 - An Importation of Potentially Varroa
4 - Evaluations of the Varroa-resistance of
5 - Resistance to the Parasitic Mite Varroa
6 - Multi-State Field Trials: Varroa Response
7 - Multi-State Field Trials: Honey Production
8 - Multi-State Field Trials: Acarapis Response
9 - The Release of ARS Russian Honey Bees
10 - Hygienic Behavior by Honey Bees from
11 - Well Groomed Bees Resist Tracheal Mites
12 - Well Groomed Bees Resist Tracheal Mites (1998)
13 - Suppression of Mite Reproduction (SMR Trait)
14 - Varroa jacobsoni Reproduction
15 - Population Measurements
16 - The SMR/VSH trait explained by hygienic behavior of adult bees
Multi-State Field Trials: Acarapis Response

Multi-State Field Trials of ARS Russian Honey Bees
3.  Responses to Acarapis woodi 1999, 2000

 

ARS Primorsky honey bees were evaluated for their resistance to Acarapis woodi by monitoring natural infestations in colonies located in Iowa, Louisiana and Mississippi.  In 1999, Primorsky colonies had lower levels of A. woodi infestation than the domestic colonies. Low tracheal mite infestations were also observed in 2000.  The 10 Primorsky queen-lines tested were all resistant to tracheal mites.  However, resistance was more pronounced in Louisiana and Mississippi wherein 0-3% infestations were recorded.  It is possible that environmental factors influenced the degree of infestation between the states and within Primorsky lines, especially in Iowa.  With careful selection, it is possible to further enhance resistance of Primorsky honey bees to tracheal mite parasitism.

Fig. 1 - Prevalence (a) and intensity (b) of A. woodi in ARS Primorsky and domestic honey bee colonies in Iowa, Louisiana and Mississippi in 1999

Fig. 1 - Prevalence (a) and intensity (b) of A. woodi in ARS Primorsky and domestic honey bee colonies in Iowa, Louisiana and Mississippi in 1999

Fig. 2 - Prevalence of A. woodi in 10 lines of ARS Primorsky honey bees in Iowa (a), Louisiana (b), and Mississippi (c) in 2000.  Colors were designated for each Primorsky line.

Fig. 2 - Prevalence of A. woodi in 10 lines of ARS Primorsky honey bees in Iowa (a), Louisiana (b), and Mississippi (c) in 2000.  Colors were designated for each Primorsky line.

Fig. 3 - Intensity of A. woodi in 10 lines of ARS Primorsky honey bees in Iowa (a), Louisiana (b), and Mississippi (c) in 2000.  Colors were designated for each Primorsky line.

Fig. 3 - Intensity of A. woodi in 10 lines of ARS Primorsky honey bees in Iowa (a), Louisiana (b), and Mississippi (c) in 2000.  Colors were designated for each Primorsky line.


Reference to full article:

L. I. DE GUZMAN, T. E. RINDERER, G. T.  DELATTE, J. A. STELZER, V. A. LANCASTER, J. L. WILLIAMS, L. D. BEAMAN, V. KUZNETSOV, M. BIGALK, S. J. BERNARD and H. TUBBS. 2001. Multi-State Field Trials of ARS Russian Honey Bees:  3.  Responses to Acarapis woodi 1999, 2000.  American Bee Journal 141:810-812

<< Previous    1     2     3     4     5     6     7     [8]     9     10     11     12     13     14     15     16     Next >>

   
ARS Products & Services Links
  ARS Products & Services
  TEKTRAN

 
Last Modified: 02/25/2011
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House