Page Banner

United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Research Service

Rangeland Decision-Making Project
headline bar

Rangelands provide many benefits to society. They produce forage for livestock, prevent soil erosion, and serve as habitat for a variety of wildlife. Rangeland management strategies are needed that promote livestock production while simultaneously enhancing other rangeland benefits. As part of a collaborative effort (University of California-Davis, University of Wyoming, Colorado State University, Texas A&M University), scientists from the Rangeland Resources Research Unit are investigating effects of rangeland management decision-making in the Western Great Plains. They are taking a multi-pronged approach to address complex interactions among ecosystems and people, using a mail survey, ranch visits, and an adaptive grazing experiment. Learn more about each project by browsing project news and project summaries below.

Recent News from the Rangeland Decision-Making Project:

survey cover Rangeland Decision-Making Survey

Wyoming rangelands are managed for livestock production as well as a variety of other goals such as wildlife, energy, water, and open space. How management decisions are made on these diverse lands was the central question of the Rangeland Decision-Making Survey, a collaborative effort among the Wyoming Stock Growers Association (WSGA), the USDA-Agricultural Research Service, the University of Wyoming and the University of California-Davis. The survey asked WSGA producer members about their goals, ranch characteristics, and management practices. A total of 307 ranchers (50%) responded.

How much do you know about Wyoming ranches? Click here for a summary of survey results.

 

Linking Decision-Making to Outcomes on Wyoming Ranches

Livestock grazing management is a key tool for promoting livestock production while simultaneously enhancing other rangeland benefits. We visited working ranches in southeast Wyoming in order to understand grazing management decision-making and outcomes. Each visit included 1) an interview about grazing management decision-making and responses to drought and 2) measurements of ecosystem services at two locations, the site that has the best forage for livestock production and the site where forage for livestock production has the most room for improvement. Ongoing analyses of interview and monitoring data will link grazing management decisions to ecosystem service provision.

Infographic – Preliminary results highlight differences between ecological sites—sandy sites generally have more forage.

Ranch visit


Project Sponsors:

QUESTIONS? COMMENTS? CONTACT:

Emily Kachergis
Rangeland Ecologist,
USDA-ARS, Cheyenne, WY
Phone:  (307) 772-2433 extension 105
Email:  Emily.Kachergis@ars.usda.gov

 


Last Modified: 1/9/2014
Footer Content Back to Top of Page